A friend of mine (well, lots of them actually, but for now, i'll use one example) said that a man's wealth was one of her main criteria to decide whether she would marry him or not. i.e. it would be one of the top three deciding factors. And as more of my female friends reach the 'marriageable' age (i'm still not sure exactly what that is by the way), they too seem to find their prospective partner's financial stablity to be quite a point of concern.
Of course, money is important. Anyone stupid enough to say otherwise is obviously living in a parallel universe where everything is free. But for the rest of us, you can't seem to do very much without the moolah. That's not the point in question however. My friend's argument was this - If my father has worked his whole life to bring his family up to a certain standard of living, why is it wrong to want to stay at that same level, or rise above it?
Fair enough, no argument with that either. My question is, why are you dependant on someone else to provide that lifestyle
for you? Isn't it sort of insulting to your father that you've learned nothing about working hard and providing for yourself and your family, rather than just mooching off someone else? A lot of well-to-do girls even see it as their 'right' to the money, even though they did absolutely nothing to earn it.
My father routinely drilled this fact into us, "It's not your money, it's mine", and even though at the time I was quite resentful of this statement, I've come to appreciate his principles on the subject. I may inherit a big fat chunk of money later on in life, or I may not... either way, I was given an education, and a good one at that, so that I would
not have to be dependant on someone else to maintain me or whatever lifestyle I had become accustomed to.
And the same applies to those girls' parents that look into the financial stability of the prospective boys' families. Even if his family does have pots of money, how does that have any reflection on the boy himself? I can understand if you were looking at the father as a future partner for your child, but if you're not, then how could his money possibly interest you? It bears no testament to the ability of the boy to earn a living and stand on his own feet, never mind about keeping your daughter well. Which in turn brings us back to the original point, if you educated your daughter, possibly sent her abroad, invested all that money in making sure she was prepared to work her way up in the world, why the bloody hell does she need to be
kept?
It's a vicious little circle.